If that happened I would happily buy the game and play it. Make it as realistic as possible and have an actual vast map IMO. They should gather information pertaining to real animal populations for the regions they have for their maps. No matter what anybody changes or does, there will always be someone complaining and wanting something "just because" and that idea or change really doesn't change anything and we are all back to square one, a complete circle jerk of events. but, since the "too many animals crying" reduced the population (patch 1.2) the player is now actually spending 4-6 hours walking around to get a good trophy with reduced grinding because the level 0-4 animals are now far and few between. If our hunting area was 100 sq miles, we would have 100 animals to play with. These animals are "home bodies", meaning that one animal will spend it's entire life living in a bout 1 sq mile (640 acres).
I just read an article about Blacktail deer in Oregon. Having more maps that link to one another would be a better idea at expanding the regions (reserves). Performance wise, the current map size seems good to me. Players are already complaining it takes many hours to unlock something, I can't even imagine a cpu player walking 6 hours to get anywhere before the tears start to flow. I think the IRL hunters would appreciate a big map, but computer gamers are nortoriously lazy and time restricted. I hunt IRL and will hike for 4-6 hours to get to a spot then camp out for a few days. Originally posted by MrBohannon:For a hunting game I would have expected a bigger map.
0 kommentar(er)
